Lesson 9: Place, Space, and Ethnographic Grounding

Ethnography unfolds in places: alleyways, kitchens, clinics, forests, checkpoints, offices, sidewalks. But the way you write about space and place shapes how those environments are perceived and interpreted. This lesson explores how places become meaningful through social life and how writing can evoke not just the appearance of a location, but its textures, rhythms, silences, and embedded histories. Rather than treating setting as passive backdrop, ethnographic writing can animate place as an active force in shaping experience and relation.

According to Doreen Massey (2005:10), understanding place as constituted through interrelations allows us to see it not as a static container but as a dynamic participant in the formation of identities and practices. This view resists treating identities-or places-as fixed or self-contained. Instead, it foregrounds the ongoing, contested processes through which both are made. The perspective that follows is not one that simply seeks recognition for pre-given identities or bounded localities, but one that treats the making of those identities and places as a critical site of cultural, political, and social negotiation.

From this perspective, place is not merely where social life happens; it is co-constitutive of it. In ethnographic terms, this means place is never just a backdrop to events or encounters. It is an active medium that shapes meaning, mediates experience, and participates in the constitution of subjectivities. Just as subjectivities are produced through situated and negotiated practices, so too are places—never complete, always in flux, and deeply entangled in the spatiality of collective life.

In everyday discourse—and in much academic writing—there is a tendency to collapse place into space. As Yi-Fu Tuan (1977) explains, place is space made meaningful through lived experience. Space, by contrast, is abstract and undifferentiated. Space is “transformed into place as it acquires definition and meaning.” (Tuan 1977:136). Yet in writing, even meaningful places are often rendered as coordinates or surface-level description. Think of how a city appears on a map: it provides data—elevation, proximity, infrastructure—but cannot evoke the feel of walking its streets, the smells of its markets, or the ambient tensions of its neighborhoods. Ethnographic writing must resist this flattening. It must recreate the lived sense of place: what it feels like to move through it, to dwell in it, or to be excluded from it.

Doing this well requires attention to more than visual cues. Consider what sounds punctuate the space, what histories lie just beneath the surface, what movements are enabled or blocked. Use pacing to mimic movement through space; shift between wide-angle and close-up to reflect sensory and affective attention; embed memory, speculation, or local myth to signal layered temporalities. Strong place-writing often relies on juxtaposition, material detail, and attunement to atmosphere. These techniques allow writers to convey the dynamism of place—not as static scenery, but as lived and contested terrain.

Here are some techniques and examples that illustrate how to write place ethnographically:

These strategies help avoid both generic description ("The neighborhood was peaceful") and data dumps (lists of geographic or architectural facts). Instead, they allow you to ground your ethnographic writing in place as something felt, inhabited, and shaped through relational life.


Focus

Render place as lived, layered, and affectively charged.

Learning Goals

Activities

Back to the list of all lessons